[Last update: 8 November 2002]

United Nations Imposes Sanctions on the U.S.

by Carolyn S. Scarr

NEW YORK (8 November, 2002, ESP) In a surprise move, the United Nations Security Council today voted to impose economic sanctions on the United States for its threats of war and build up of military forces preparatory to an unprovoked attack on the sovereign state of Iraq. Basing their decision on the principles of Collective Security founded on Article I, Paragraph 1 of the United Nations Charter the Security Council adopted language similar to that which launched the war against North Korea upon that country's attack on its neighbor, South Korea.

[box or sidebar] excerpts from the United Nations Charter see below

Since the aggression on the part of the United States is the subject of the resolution, it was determined by the legal advisors of the Security Council that the United States did not have the right to veto the resolution which sanctions it for its violations of the provisions of the UN Charter.

Military action against the United States is being held in reserve, in light of the fact that the United States is the possessor of the largest stock of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the world and the most effective means of delivery. There are U.S. military bases on every continent, U.S. fleets in every ocean. The United States is the only country to have used nuclear weapons against a civilian population.

European Union nations, with the exception of the United Kingdom, froze the assets of large U.S. businesses, particularly those in the oil business. Japanese and other Asian nations followed suit. In Vietnam, the factories built by U.S. firms and employing Vietnamese nationals at low wages were nationalized. Vietnam claimed that by that expropriation they were compensated only in part for reparations long due them in light of the fact that workers were due billions of $US in back wages and benefits. China is considering its options, as are countries in Africa and Latin America.

The international community is considering what actions to take against individual U.S. citizens. Among the persons being considered for legal action for warmongering (which is a violation of international law; the author will look up the code later) are:

  • Henry Kissinger, for formulating the proposal whereby hundreds of years of international law may be violated by the United States which would become uniquely permitted to attack other countries at will. This investigation will not preclude ongoing work on charges of crimes against humanity against Kissinger for his role in the invasion of East Timor, the overthrow of the government of Chile, inter alia.

  • U.S. Congressman Tom Lantos, for presenting in 1990 false testimony to create war fever -- namely the false story of Iraqi soldiers tearing babies out of incubators. The Gulf War, which Lantos' lies helped to bring about by creating an atmosphere inimical to a negotiated settlement of the disputes between Iraq and Kuwait, is seen as the prelude to the subsequent history of attacks on Iraq throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, the continued economic embargo which has caused the deaths of over a million Iraqi civilians and the present drive toward U.S. war against Iraq.

  • U.S. generals for attacks on Iraq's air defenses which Iraq has the right to have and maintain for defense against foreign aggression. attacks on Iraq's retreating troops in 1991 attacks on Iraq's water, sewage treatment plants and electric supply in 1991

  • Presidents Bush I, Clinton and Bush II for their parts in attacks on Iraq and for insisting on "regime change" as a condition of sanctions considered to be genocidal. UNSCR 687, which instituted the sanctions on Iraq, specifically stated that Iraq's sovereignty was to be respected.
  • Other persons may be charged as investigations continue.

    The U.S. response has been a stunned silence. Numerous other countries have suffered U.S. assaults without action on the part of the United Nations. The only instance on record of international reproach to the United States is the case in which the World Court ruled that the United States owed Nicaragua for having mined their harbors. The U.S. refused to acknowledge jurisdiction and did not pay anything in damages.

    United States citizens have not been informed of the actions by the United Nations.

    United Nations Charter excerpts:

    Article 1

    The Purposes of the United Nations are:

    1.To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

    . . . .

    Article 2

    The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.

    1.The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.

    . . . .

    3.All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

    4.All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

    . . . .

    Article 39

    The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

    Article 41

    The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.

    Article 42

    Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.


    article 2002 Carolyn S. Scarr
    permission to reprint, forward or otherwise distributed this satire is freely granted to anyone for peaceful purposes. Please let Carolyn Scarr know of any uses at epicalc@earthlink.net The quotes from the UN Charter are accurate. The UN Charter can be found at the UN website http://www.un.org

    Back to Iraq Resources
    Back to "War on Terrorism" Resources
    Back to ProgressiveAustin main page
    Back to Austin Against War main page

    Contact this site